The Truth About Sec 39 Qld Adoption Act

Mothers' Privacy? A Fallacy of the APPG
Home
Public Consultation Paper
Historical Overview of sec 39
Govt Letters Confirming Fraud
Mothers Privacy ?
Adoption Order
Non-Id Information
Letters to Adopters
Department Catagories of Adopters
Origins Main Site

Expected Child for Adoption
eca001.jpg

Lelani: (Queensland dept worker) - “Nobody even thought twice about the mother at the time, except to get the information to match the baby with the adoptive parents.”

report1.gif

A typical report of investigation.

This report was sent by the hospital to the Childrens Services depart to notify them of an Illegitimate birth after recieving this report the mother would be investigated by the Department  and also the police 

birth1.gif

This report was sent from the Dept of Births, Deaths and Marriages to the Childrens Services Department to notify an illegitimate birth   
 
In the peak years of adoption, mothers of these children were hunted down and treated as criminals to the extent that police were obliged to search any house or premises at any hour of the day to ascertain whether their had been an infringement of the act.
 
These reports were compulsory under the Infant Life Protection Act 1905 and are still till today written into the Adoption of Children Act, according to a letter from the Department of Families have not been enacted up since the late 1980s   

 

Adoption workers of the era tended to be more conservative than their peers in child protection.   Lelani:- “Back then it was - Married people were good parents; unmarried people were not. It was as simple as that - a middle class view, based solely on children’s physical needs. The married couple could provide a home, steady income and education; the single parent couldn’t. It wasn’t based on anything, it was just an assumption.”

 
consent001.jpg

Adoption Consent 1967

Lelani –( A Queensland Departmental Worker)  “I don’t remember any written information outlining the alternatives. Or any which said  it was our role to inform the mother of these. In hindsight, we just followed the departmental traditions – which was that it was not our role to help the mother keep her baby – it was our role to get her signature on the consent form.

The Adoption Privacy Protection Group (APPG)  have used the fallacy when argueing for the continuence of sec 39 that Mothers were promised privacy when they signed the consent.
 
As you can see there is no provision for privacy on the adoption consent, it  states that the mother loses all of her legal rights to her child.
 
It is the State that have not only taken away her legal rights but also her rights to privacy
Origins Inc Supporting People Separated by Adoption
Copywrite Origins Inc 2008